Protecting the Mitchell Catchment
Learn More History
“Millions in public funding are being used to reshape the Mitchell River catchment for irrigation, despite ongoing opposition from Traditional Owners and community with growing concerns for the future of water, Country and culture.”

The Issue

The proposed Lakeland Irrigation Area Scheme would flood over 3,000 hectares of land and convert 10,000 hectares to irrigated agriculture, despite concerns about water availability, cultural and environmental impacts, and poor economic returns. More than $10 million in public funding has been spent on planning, yet there is currently insufficient water allocation and no identified project proponent.

The Alternative

Instead of investing in a costly and high-risk dam, funding could support a more resilient approach to water security. This includes First Nations-led water management, on-farm efficiency improvements, small-scale water storage, catchment restoration, weed and feral animal control, community infrastructure, and climate resilience projects, delivering benefits for agriculture, communities, culture, and the environment while protecting the long-term health of the Mitchell Catchment.

Take Action

Northern Australia stands at a crossroads. Home to globally significant rivers, wetlands, savannas and living First Nations cultures, it is too precious to sacrifice to short-term industrial expansion.

The proposed Lakeland Irrigation Scheme risks damaging the Palmer River and Mitchell Catchment while relying on billions in public funding despite serious economic and environmental concerns. Sign the petition to protect Country, safeguard our rivers, and support a resilient future for Northern Australia.

Across northern Australia, a “Developing the North” agenda has pushed for more dams, irrigation and groundwater use to grow agriculture and regional economies. In the Mitchell River catchment, the proposed Lakeland Irrigation Area Scheme has already involved  millions of dollars of public money spent on studies, business cases and planning, including about $825,000 for early feasibility work and $10 million for the Detailed Business Case.

This taxpayer funding has been used to promote large-scale irrigation, despite ongoing questions about how much water is actually available, and whether the system will hold up under a changing climate. The result is a model that relies heavily on public investment to enable agricultural expansion.

Traditional Owners across the Mitchell River catchment have repeatedly and strongly raised concerns about this direction. They have highlighted inadequate consultation, limited influence over decision-making, and the risk that their Country is being reshaped around external agricultural interests. Concerns also focus on damage to river systems, cultural sites and the long-term health of water in the catchment, with many arguing the process prioritises development over their rights, knowledge and governance of water.

Despite these concerns, the development agenda continues to move forward through government-funded studies, planning reforms and water infrastructure programs. For many people across the region, this raises serious questions about why taxpayers are continuing to fund large-scale irrigation expansion in a contested and environmentally sensitive catchment, while community concerns about water, culture and long-term sustainability remain unresolved.

Senior elders for the Jawiyaba Warra Aboriginal Corporation, Uncle Graham and Uncle Qawanji after meeting with CAFNEC to discuss the concerns about the proposed dam.

Natarsha Bell, Traditional Owner with connection to Palmer River speaking at a CAFNEC event raising awareness of the issues about the Palmer River Dam.

Senior elder for the Jawiyaba Warra Aboriginal Corporation participating in Yalanji smoking ceremony at CAFNEC event raising awareness of the issues about the Palmer River Dam.

What it Needs to Go Ahead

The Lakeland Irrigation Scheme is a major development and will need a number of key changes to go ahead.

An allocation in the Mitchell Water Plan, which is currently under Review

The Scheme requires the water to be pumped out of the Mitchell Water Plan area into the Cape York Water Plan area. What’s known as an inter-basin transfer. So the Cape York Water Plan would need to reflect the transfer.

Government investment of an estimated 2.5 Billion. This would likely have to come from both State and Federal sources.

Planning Changes

The current planning regulations would not enable the project in it’s entirety, so changes to local government planning would be required.

Both the FNQ Regional Plan & Cape York Regional Plan are under review, it’s not clear that the irrigation scheme in indicated in the future growth patterns of the regions.

Statement from Kwaji Warra Traditional Owners, Clan group of Western Yalanji Nation Group

For 65,000 years Kawanji Warra clan lived on our homeland within the GuGu Western Yalanji boundaries.

We stand here today to ask you to stand up with us as we stand up for the right to protect the Palmer River and the Mitchell River catchment.

We are not interested in supporting the Lakeland Irrigation Scheme or the development of a hydropower source built by SMEC, the snowy mountain electrical company, through the building of a dam at Lakeland in North Queensland. 

Kawanji recognises that there is a water shortage in Northern Queensland and we are concerned for our community and for our land, our flora and our fuana. We understand that the Lakeland Irrigation Scheme will bring some quick benefits, some economic and some provision of water and electricity. 

However it’s the negative effects on Yalanji people that concerns us mostly. The flooding of our landscape, the effects of erosion, and the impacts on sacred sites, sediment being washed downstream, native fish being lost to new invasive species, algae growing in our reservoirs leading to higher greenhouse gases and the disruption of ecosystems. The Palmer River connects us together. We are the headwater and feel the responsibility not to damage the river system, so the clans downstream don’t pay a heavy cost. Above all of this we Traditional Owners lose story places, sacred places and see the break down songlines.

All that identifies us as Palmer River mob. We cannot allow the irrigation scheme and dam to be built. We stand here today to ask you, Traditional Owners, Scientists and professionals to support us and our decision to say no to the Lakeland Irrigation scheme and the Palmer River dam. To support us by signing the petition and stand with us in protecting our homeland. 

History of the Lakeland Irrigation Scheme

2015: Developing Northern Australia White Paper

In 2015, the Australian Government released the Developing Northern Australia White Paper, outlining a major agenda to expand agriculture, dams, and water infrastructure across northern Australia. The policy identified water development as a key economic driver, helping create the political setting to allow for future proposals like the Lakeland Irrigation Area Scheme in Cape York.

2015: National Water Infrastructure Development Fund (NWIDF) Established

The National Water Infrastructure Development Fund (NWIDF) was established by the Australian Government in 2015 as part of the broader Developing Northern Australia White Paper agenda. Originally launched as a $500 million program, the fund was designed to accelerate the planning and construction of dams, irrigation schemes, pipelines and groundwater projects across regional and northern Australia.

The fund aimed to “unlock” water resources to support agricultural expansion, regional economic growth and new infrastructure investment. It included funding for both feasibility studies and construction projects, helping move proposed irrigation developments, including schemes like Lakeland, from concept stage toward implementation using significant public funding.

2017: Cape York Sustainable Futures Feasibility Study for Lakeland Irrigation Area Scheme

In 2017, Cape York Sustainable Futures (CYSF) received $825,000 through the National Water Infrastructure Development Fund to undertake the Futures Feasibility Study. CYSF engaged SMEC as the principal engineering and technical consultant for the Lakeland Irrigation Area feasibility study. SMEC worked alongside the Queensland Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy (DNRME) to undertake hydrological, engineering, land and soil assessments for the scheme

The feasibility study helped build the economic and political case for increased groundwater extraction and agricultural intensification in Lakeland.

Established in 2008 to promote economic and agricultural development across Cape York, CYSF played a key role in advancing proposals for expanded irrigation and water infrastructure in the region and remained active until its ABN was cancelled in 2021.

2018: Northern Australia Resource Assessment

In 2018, the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation completed the Northern Australia Water Resource Assessment as part of the broader Northern Australia Resource Assessment program funded by the Australian Government. The project examined major northern catchments identified for future agricultural and water infrastructure expansion, including the Mitchell catchment in Cape York, which contains the Palmer River and a range of proposed dam and irrigation development sites.

The Mitchell catchment was assessed for its groundwater, surface water and agricultural development potential, helping build the technical foundation for future irrigation expansion proposals across the region. Similar assessments were undertaken across northern Australia, creating a coordinated pipeline of development-ready catchments. Today, many of the rivers and floodplains examined through the program are facing increasing pressure from dams, irrigation schemes, groundwater extraction and agricultural intensification.

References

2019: Establishment of the National Water Grid and Fund

In 2019, the Australian Government established the National Water Grid and National Water Grid Fund to coordinate and finance major water infrastructure projects across Australia. Building on earlier northern development policies, the program focused heavily on dams, irrigation schemes and water extraction projects designed to expand agricultural production and regional economic growth.

While promoted as a nation-building initiative, the National Water Grid has been widely criticised for prioritising large-scale development over river health, climate resilience and First Nations water rights. Across northern Australia, the program has continued directing significant public funding into water infrastructure planning and project development, while longstanding calls for stronger First Nations water governance and cultural water protections remain largely unaddressed.

2020: RDATN Begin the Detailed Business Case for Lakeland Irrigation Area Scheme

In 2020, Regional Development Australia Tropical North (RDATN) secured $10 million in Commonwealth funding through the National Water Infrastructure Development Fund to prepare a Detailed Business Case for the Lakeland Irrigation Area Scheme. The funding marked a major escalation in public investment toward progressing large-scale irrigation development in Cape York.

At the time, RDATN was chaired by David Kempton, a prominent advocate for northern development and agricultural expansion. Under Kempton’s leadership, RDATN actively promoted the Lakeland scheme as a nationally significant irrigation project, positioning it within the broader National Water Grid agenda focused on expanding water infrastructure across northern Australia.

The Detailed Business Case investigated a proposed dam on the Palmer River and infrastructure capable of dramatically increasing irrigated agriculture in the Lakeland region. By this stage, millions of dollars in public funding had already been directed toward studies, business cases and technical assessments designed to advance water extraction and agricultural expansion across the Mitchell catchment.

2021: Traditional Owners begin Raising Concerns about Lakeland Irrigation Area Scheme

In 2021, Jawiyabba Warra Aboriginal Corporation reached out to CAFNEC to raise concerns about the Lakeland Irrigation Area Scheme and the accelerating push for large-scale water development across the Mitchell catchment. Following this, CAFNEC started more focused work supporting Traditional Owners to have their concerns heard and engage in the public process. 

Concerns were also from other Traditional Owners and communities across the region, including from Eastern catchments people who are worried about increased agricultural and sediment runoff flowing into East to increased irrigated agriculture. 

Traditional Owners across the Mitchell catchment also raised concerns about the downstream impacts of dams, groundwater extraction and irrigation expansion on river flows, wetlands, fisheries and culturally significant waterways. These concerns highlighted the growing tension between federally backed irrigation development and the protection of interconnected river systems, and cultural values. 

2021: Productivity Commission Inquiry into National Water Reform

In 2021, the Productivity Commission released its final inquiry report into Australia’s national water reform framework. The review examined progress under the National Water Initiative and assessed how governments were managing water planning, extraction, environmental protections and Indigenous water interests across the country.

The inquiry found that First Nations peoples remained significantly underrepresented in water decision-making and continued to hold only a very small share of Australia’s water entitlements. It also highlighted ongoing failures to properly incorporate Indigenous cultural objectives into water planning processes. While governments continued investing heavily in new water infrastructure and irrigation expansion, the report reinforced concerns that Indigenous water justice and governance reform were not being advanced at the same pace.

2023 Detailed Business Case Completed by RDATN

In 2020, Regional Development Australia Tropical North (RDATN) secured $10 million in Commonwealth funding through the National Water Infrastructure Development Fund to prepare a Detailed Business Case for the Lakeland Irrigation Area Scheme. The funding marked a major escalation in public investment toward progressing large-scale irrigation development in Cape York.

At the time, RDATN was chaired by David Kempton, a prominent advocate for northern development and agricultural expansion. Under Kempton’s leadership, RDATN actively promoted the Lakeland scheme as a nationally significant irrigation project, positioning it within the broader National Water Grid agenda focused on expanding water infrastructure across northern Australia.

The Detailed Business Case investigated a proposed dam on the Palmer River and associated infrastructure capable of increasing irrigated agriculture in the Lakeland region. The Detailed Business Case found that the Lakeland Irrigation Area Scheme would require $2.5 billion to get up, with 97% of funding from government sources, and with a Benefit Cost Ratio of just 0.13–0.37 its economic and environmental case is weak.

Department of Regional Development, Manufacturing and Water 

  • Water Entitlements: There is insufficient unallocated water in the Mitchell Water Plan to meet the project’s needs. The water plan expires in 2027, and while a review could increase available water, there’s no guarantee this will happen or meet the project’s full requirements.
  • Geological Conditions: Geological conditions at the dam site are not fully understood, having only been investigated by a relatively small number of boreholes, but issues are possible due to the known location
    of the Palmer River Fault and rock conditions that showed high water losses under testing.
  • Fish Transfer Arrangements: Plans for fish transfer at the dam are not finalised. Proposed solutions include a fish lift and a flushing lock, but costs cannot be confirmed until design options are developed.
  • Transfer Tunnel: Only two boreholes have been drilled along the 12 km tunnel route. This limited data raises risks for cost and timeline overruns, despite allowances in the projected costs.
  • Distribution System: Changes have been made to the pipeline materials to address risks caused by the high pressures that will occur due to the gravity transfer through the tunnel, although further consideration will be needed to determine whether the risks have been fully addressed
  • Economic Viability: The project’s high construction costs and low economic benefits pose significant challenges. The benefit-cost ratio is estimated between 0.13 and 0.37, meaning only a small fraction of the capital cost will be recovered. The project does not meet cost recovery expectations and would require substantial grants and subsidies

References

2024: David Kempton Steps Down as Chair of RDATN

In 2024, David Kempton stepped down as Chair of Regional Development Australia Tropical North (RDATN), marking the end of a period in which the organisation played a central role in advancing the Lakeland Irrigation Area Scheme through successive stages of Commonwealth-funded planning and business case development.

During Kempton’s tenure, RDATN was closely involved in positioning Lakeland as a priority irrigation development, securing and managing funding through the National Water Grid. His leadership coincided with a broader push to translate earlier feasibility work into a detailed investment-ready proposal for large-scale water infrastructure in Cape York.

His departure came after the completion of the Detailed Business Case process, which had been built on years of publicly funded studies across the Mitchell River catchment. The project remained a focal point in ongoing debates about northern water development, cumulative catchment impacts and the role of public funding in enabling large-scale irrigation expansion.

2025: David Kempton Elected as State Member for Cook

In 2025, David Kempton was elected as the State Member for Cook. During his election campaign, he made a public commitment to provide $190,000 in funding support to the Lakeland Growers Association, following concerns from growers that they had not been adequately engaged in the Detailed Business Case process led by Regional Development Australia Tropical North.

This commitment occurred alongside wider concerns about the Lakeland Irrigation Area Scheme process, where both agricultural stakeholders and Traditional Owner groups raised issues about consultation for the Detailed Business Case. For Traditional Owners concerns centred on how water allocation decisions were shaping the future of Country, with the catchment effectively being positioned to supply water to support agricultural expansion in Lakeland due to the lack of available water in Lakeland, at an impact to culture and nature.

The result was an increasingly contested process over who has influence over water management and the future aspirations for the Mitchell catchment, with ongoing concerns that affected Traditional Owners were not being given equivalent voice in decisions that directly impact their Country.

2025: Review of Mitchell River Water Plan Begins

In 2025, the Queensland Government commenced a review of the Mitchell River Water Plan, reopening consideration of water allocation rules, environmental flow objectives and potential future development scenarios across the catchment. The review is significant because it directly influences how much water can be extracted from the Mitchell River catchment for agriculture, including irrigation proposals linked to the Lakeland region.

The process has implications for both existing water users and Traditional Owner groups whose Country and cultural values are embedded in the river system. For many across the catchment, the review represents a critical moment in determining whether future water planning will prioritise large-scale agricultural expansion or more strongly recognise ecological limits, cultural water rights and long-term sustainability of the Mitchell system.

Both CAFNEC and Traditional Owners concerned about the protection of water in the Mitchell Catchment are engaged in the review.

2025: State Government 'Unlocking Water' Scheme begins

In 2025, the Queensland Government advanced a new “Unlocking Water” agenda aimed at identifying and accelerating water infrastructure opportunities to support agricultural and regional development across the state. The initiative aligns with broader northern Australia policy settings that prioritise expanding irrigation, improving water storage, and enabling new areas of land to be brought into production.

In the context of the Mitchell River catchment and the Lakeland Irrigation Area Scheme, the “Unlocking Water” approach reinforces ongoing pressure to make more water available for consumptive use, even as catchment planning processes and Traditional Owner concerns continue to highlight ecological limits, cultural values, and questions about long-term sustainability.

2026: Cook Shire Commence Major Amendment to Planning Scheme

Read CAFNEC’s Submission to the Proposed Amendment

In 2026, the Cook Shire Council commenced a major amendment to its planning scheme, updating land-use zoning, development controls and strategic growth directions for the region. The amendment is closely linked to ongoing water planning and infrastructure discussions, including the implications of the Mitchell River Water Plan and broader “unlocking water” policy settings.

The planning scheme review has significant implications for the future of the Lakeland, Queensland, Australia area, where land-use planning is increasingly being considered alongside potential irrigation expansion. It forms part of a wider governance shift in which local planning, water allocation and infrastructure investment are being aligned to enable future agricultural development, while raising ongoing questions about environmental limits, cultural values, and equitable participation in decision-making across the Mitchell River catchment.

Findings of the Detailed Business Case

“Given the challenges identified in the DBC and the outstanding items to be resolved, including the notable issue of there being insufficient unallocated water available at the damsite, it is difficult to identify a way forward for the Project at the current time. In the DBC, the proponent has identified that the project has a high cost and comparatively low economic benefits.”

Department of Regional Development, Manufacturing and Water - Lakeland Irrigation Area Scheme Detailed Business Case

“RDATN recognises that there are significant policy, technical, cost and economic issues to be addressed to accept and implement this project.”

Lakeland Irrigation Area Scheme, Detailed Business Case, RDATN Submission to Government

Concerns Raised by the Department of Regional Development, Manufacturing and Water 

  • Water Entitlements: There is insufficient unallocated water in the Mitchell Water Plan to meet the project’s needs. The water plan expires in 2027, and while a review could increase available water, there’s no guarantee this will happen or meet the project’s full requirements.
  • Geological Conditions: Geological conditions at the dam site are not fully understood, having only been investigated by a relatively small number of boreholes, but issues are possible due to the known location
    of the Palmer River Fault and rock conditions that showed high water losses under testing.

  • Fish Transfer Arrangements: Plans for fish transfer at the dam are not finalised. Proposed solutions include a fish lift and a flushing lock, but costs cannot be confirmed until design options are developed.
  • Transfer Tunnel: Only two boreholes have been drilled along the 12 km tunnel route. This limited data raises risks for cost and timeline overruns, despite allowances in the projected costs.
  • Distribution System: Changes have been made to the pipeline materials to address risks caused by the high
    pressures that will occur due to the gravity transfer through the tunnel, although further consideration will be needed to determine whether the risks have been fully addressed

  • Economic Viability: The project’s high construction costs and low economic benefits pose significant challenges. The benefit-cost ratio is estimated between 0.13 and 0.37, meaning only a small fraction of the capital cost will be recovered. The project does not meet cost recovery expectations and would require substantial grants and subsidies